For buying teams
Buy on evidence.
Bring a need. Get qualified candidates, a verdict per vendor, and the proof behind your pick.
The journey
From a need to a decision
State the need in plain words
Type it like you would say it: the problem, the constraints, the team it touches. A composer turns it into staged evaluations.
“We need demand forecasting for our store network. Compare Forecastly, Stockwise, RetailBrain...”
Get candidates, or bring your own list
Name a need and get a ranked shortlist with a rationale per pick and a note on the incumbents. Have candidates already? Paste the list, rows stage themselves.
Compare verdicts side by side
Each pair returns a short, verdict-led memo. Sort by verdict, spot the surprises, drop the noise.
Go deep on the finalists
One click expands a pair into the full analysis: fit areas, expected gains, implementation, pricing assessment, risks.
Your context stays yours
Files, free text, and connected folders sharpen the memo. Raw inputs stay on your side of the wall. The vendor team has no path into them, structurally: access control, a wall of rights.
Private files stay private
Uploads, free text, and connected folders sharpen the memo. The raw inputs never leave your side of the wall.
Enrich when it matters
Add context as the evaluation narrows: a policy doc, a stack diagram, a constraint nobody wrote down yet.
Escalate on your terms
You choose which question reaches a vendor, with the excerpt you select. Nothing crosses by default.
Prospecting on someone else's behalf? See the Explorer or head back to the overview.